The Upper Tribunal (UT) enforced the principles of natural justice, ruling that when children genuinely live with both parents, the final decision regarding state benefit entitlement falls exclusively
Immigration Law Services
Author Archives: Squares Law
08
Oct
Oct
The Court of Appeal (CoA) addressed the stringent statutory framework governing the deportation of foreign nationals and the necessity of thoroughly assessing an appellant’s likely financial
01
Oct
Oct
The Upper Tribunal (UT) has referred a barrister to the Bar Standards Board (BSB) for investigation after he relied on a fabricated legal citation generated by ChatGPT.
Facts:
The case began on 14
01
Oct
Oct
The High Court confirmed the extension of payments beyond the child’s eighteenth birthday to cover the period of their tertiary education.
Facts:
This appeal concerns the extension of the duration
Immigration Law
Is an injunction against a hotel owner to preclude the housing of asylum seekers lawful?
24
Sep
Sep
The judgement of the Court of Appeal (CoA) establishes a crucial precedent in UK immigration law, affirming the Secretary of State for the Home Department’s (SSHD) authority and role in legal disputes
24
Sep
Sep
The High Court discharged orders prohibiting the family from taking children abroad and concluded that “clear boundaries have been overstepped”.
Facts:
This judgement concerns a family
17
Sep
Sep
The Upper Tribunal (UT) has clarified that a Biometric Residence Permit (BRP) issued in error following the refusal of an asylum claim does not constitute a valid grant of leave and does not cause a
17
Sep
Sep
The High Court has delivered a judgement in a high-stakes financial remedies case, grappling with the complex task of dividing a multi-million-pound fortune that a husband claimed had been devastated
10
Sep
Sep
Are fast-track asylum appeal adjudicators in sight?
The UK Government is proposing a significant overhaul of its asylum appeals system to clear backlogs, accelerate the return of failed asylum
10
Sep
Sep
In the latest of no fewer than three judgements in complex and high-value divorce proceedings, the High Court established that a created trust was a sham and awarded the wife a lump sum of