A recent High Court ruling on the rejection of a Christian couple’s application to become foster carers affirmed the decision of the local authority to prioritise the welfare and identity of
Immigration Law Services
Author Archives: Squares Law
10
Dec
Dec
The new UK Immigration Rules, which took effect on 11 November 2025, represent the most substantial overhaul in over a decade and stem from the Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules 1333 published
03
Dec
Dec
The Supreme Court heard an appeal regarding a resident parent’s claim for the child element of Universal Credit (UC) while the child was living, at all material times, outside of the UK.Facts:Ms.
03
Dec
Dec
The Court of Appeal (CoA) overturned an Upper Tribunal (UT) decision based on the incorrect assumption that post offices are closed on Sundays.Facts:Mr. Mohammed Baparee, a national of Bangladesh,
26
Nov
Nov
The High Court unequivocally confirmed that a transgender man’s right to conceive and carry a child is not inconsistent with his declaration to live fully in the acquired male gender for the rest of
26
Nov
Nov
The Court of Appeal (CoA) upheld the strict application of the deportation regime for foreign criminals, ruling that the mandatory public interest considerations outlined in Section 117C of the
19
Nov
Nov
The Court of Appeal (CoA) upheld the legal requirement that the permanent removal of children from settled kinship care must be based on proven facts and not on professional concern or
Immigration Law
You must have the skills and knowledge to run a branch for your Representative visa to be approved
19
Nov
Nov
A recent ruling of the Court of Appeal (CoA) established a stringent interpretation of the sole representative visa route, clarifying that the role demands long-term supervision and knowledge of the
12
Nov
Nov
Although ultimately granting a Parental Order, the High Court warned would-be parents against embarking on a surrogacy arrangement in those instances where they do not meet or have any knowledge of
12
Nov
Nov
The Court of Appeal (CoA) ruled that the Government’s decision to implement a highly restricted and secretive priority relocation policy for Afghan nationals whose safety was compromised was both a