The Court of Appeal (CoA) was faced with this exact question and confirmed that the Secretary of State (SSHD) is under no duty to carry out an assessment of the wider impact of a revocation of a
Immigration Law Services
The Court of Appeal (CoA) was faced with this exact question and confirmed that the Secretary of State (SSHD) is under no duty to carry out an assessment of the wider impact of a revocation of a
The High Court was faced with a challenging case not only because of the complex family and cultural situation, but also because of alleged coercive control and manipulation.
Background:
Both the
The Court of Appeal (CoA) was faced with the question of whether a university education could constitute an essential living need and if a three-year gap would interrupt such
The High Court was faced with a summary return order (SRO) for a child to a country which is not signatory of the 1980 Hague Convention.
Background:
The father is a British National and the mother
The Court of Appeal (CoA) was requested to examine a deportation case and whether such deportation was in breach of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
Background:
PG is a
The Court of Appeal (CoA) heard an appeal regarding an 18-month-old boy and whether delaying the procedure longer to allow a full assessment of the aunt and uncle, who were put forward by the mother
The Court of Appeal (CoA) deplored the time taken to resolve this case but agreed that the whole case should have been remitted to the lower tribunals for a complete rehearing.
Background:
AA was
The High Court took the opportunity given by this case to issue a stark warning to parents considering unlawful surrogacy abroad. As Sir Andrew McFarlane P noted, this case aims to draw attention
The Court of Appeal (CoA) refused to hear appeals that were qualified as academic appeals.
Background:
The applications related to judicial reviews of decisions by the Ministry of Defence (MoD)
The High Court faced a complex case in which one party alleged that the couple was married in a civil ceremony while the other contended that it was a fraud and that someone had impersonated him. The